The best (virtual) learning environment

Educators find that providing a varied educational experience is better for student attention, the idea of students having differing “learning styles” has been with us for a while (although it is contested theory and its worth looking at the research before making decisions).

Most would say that varying the learning method and the learning environment (class, labwork, fieldtrips) improve the learning experience.  However when it comes to the online world we are often persuaded by the convenience of having all our students automatically added to limit our environment to the VLE and when we need more functions to add tools to the VLE.  Indeed some institutions reinforce this either by policy (you can only use approved tools) or by funding (only approved tools have training and support).

Now all 3 of those are good reasons for using the VLE, – you and your students are automatically added and can find it easily, you are not going to accidentally break any rules (mainly data protection laws – something Universities should and do take very seriously) and if something does go wrong then there are people who know the system who can help you.

There are also good reasons for looking beyond the VLE, the online world is moving faster and if a new cloud tool does appear will probably be 2-3 years before you see it in your VLE on your campus (assuming development cycles and upgrades – there are faster ways for example you can use LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability) to plug tools into your VLE and this can be done with a couple of weeks testing) also VLEs tend to suffer from having to be all things to all people so the tool list grows making it harder to find the things you want.

The biggest reason to go beyond the VLE though is not about the shiny tools but about the 2 main aspects of the internet – sharing and open.  A VLE is a closed system and so it is difficult to have conversions outside of the VLE and to bring individuals into it (other than asking for accounts to be created for external people and then emailing them the account details and the url and the instructions and ……..).

Outside the VLE you can share with anyone you have the email/contact for, and your students can as well, without having to get permission from a central administrator.   Potentially they are learning with the brightest minds in the world not just the brightest minds on campus.  The open part means that they are building up a positive digital footprint, all that brilliant thinking is available for people to find ( university admissions boards, employers, potential research collaborators).  I still find this post “5 Reasons Your Students Should Blog” one of the best descriptions of why learning in the open is better.

So to provide your staff and students with the best learning environment you need a VLE (its a good safe starting point) but also a raft of other supported learning tools of varying degrees of open.

You support your staff to choose the ones that suit what they are trying to achieve.  Your training helps them understand the implications behind the levels of openness they choose.  You give them an agile route to suggest new tools/systems – and ideally make this fairly open as well.  Then finally you remove as many obstacles from their path as you can.


creative commons licensed ( BY-NC-SA ) flickr photo shared by We Are CS

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The best (virtual) learning environment

    1. josephgliddon Post author

      Dear Ryan
      I like your post, the idea of formal and informal is a good one and your idea helped me to think about what should be offered.
      Institution provides tools (and support) one axis formal and informal the other closed to open.
      Individual educator selects both formal and informal (at levels of openness they are happy with)
      Individual student assembles a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) – again with levels of openness they are happy with.

      Institution provides educators and students with advice
      Educators provide students with advice
      Students and educators provide institution with requirements

      Reply
  1. leannakjohnson

    It’s a disservice to have only one VLE (we use the term LMS) and you stated the very reason: most of them have too much functionality by trying to meet everyone’s needs. I’ve been using Classroom for collaborative work among my preservice teachers. They like that they can have access at no cost and make their own if they want. And it well suits their basic need of file sharing and communication.

    Reply
    1. josephgliddon Post author

      Dear Leana
      Thanks so much for your comment, I have been wondering about classroom for a while. I wonder if I could do what you have been doing with your preservice teachers and suggest it to my academics as a useful formative assessment tool – because the sharing is so good. They could then use our standard VLE for the final sumative work if they need a formal submission.
      Also with the recent improvements to classroom ( http://googleforeducation.blogspot.ca/2015/04/teaching-teams-new-ways-to-work.html ) its probably a good time to give it a try.

      Reply
      1. leannakjohnson

        Yes, Joseph, I think you should suggest it. Our staff and student email system is with GAFE and it makes sense to incorporate those tools in my Technology For Teachers course. I am lucky to have an IT department that considers my requests and incorporate th pe tools. The co-teacher and drafting functionality is a great new bonus to a free service.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s